robertbearclaw.com

Understanding the Uncertainties of the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic

Written on

Chapter 1: The Vulnerability of Young Adults

The 1918–1919 Spanish flu pandemic remains one of history's most lethal outbreaks, claiming approximately 50 million lives, with young adults being particularly susceptible. Epidemiological data indicate that the Spanish flu virus spreads primarily through human contact; however, human trials have raised questions about this assertion.

Puzzling Human Studies

A pivotal study conducted by Dr. Milton J. Rosenau, titled “Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza,” was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1919. The researchers isolated microbial samples from the throats and nasal passages of individuals during an outbreak and administered these samples to ten U.S. Navy volunteers who had no prior exposure to influenza. Remarkably, none of them developed symptoms.

Further tests involved drawing blood from influenza patients and transferring it to the volunteers, as well as injecting filtered mucous membrane samples from patients. In all instances, the volunteers remained healthy. In a final attempt, the volunteers interacted directly with influenza patients—shaking hands, talking, and even having patients exhale directly onto their faces. Still, none fell ill.

To rule out the possibility that these ten volunteers were immune, a second group of 50 individuals was recruited for similar experiments with patients from another outbreak. Yet again, no evidence of human-to-human transmission was found, even though one physician involved in the research contracted influenza.

Dr. Rosenau cautioned against drawing definitive conclusions from these negative results, stating, “Our volunteers may not have been susceptible. They may have been immune.” He concluded, “Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”

Other studies, such as “Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December, 1918,” similarly failed to confirm how the virus spread. The report noted, “Our failure, however, to reproduce the disease... suggests that there may be unknown factors involved.”

Reviewing these findings in a 2010 paper, John M. Eyler, Ph.D. remarked that even though the Spanish flu was thought to be highly contagious, it could not be transmitted under experimental conditions.

The Genesis of the 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic - YouTube

This video explores the origins and impact of the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, shedding light on how it changed public health approaches.

Section 1.1: Arguments Against Immunity

Some critics suggest that the study participants may have been immune, but this seems unlikely since the volunteers had no previous exposure to the virus. A review from 2008 noted that none reported symptoms, such as fever, during the 1918 outbreak. If they were immune, they would have needed prior exposure to develop adaptive immunity.

Another explanation could be that the influenza patients were beyond the infectious stage of the illness. However, Dr. Rosenau ensured that the patients were within the first three days of their illness, when the virus is most likely to be shed.

Could it be that the volunteers were never truly exposed to the Spanish flu virus? While the technology at the time could not confirm a viral diagnosis, the review suggested that clinicians had no difficulty diagnosing influenza accurately in 1919. It is equally improbable that the sick could not transmit the virus, given that many healthy individuals became ill during that period.

Spanish Flu: a warning from history - YouTube

This video examines the lessons learned from the Spanish flu pandemic and its relevance to contemporary health crises.

Section 1.2: The Mystery Continues

Ultimately, the exact reasons for the failure to replicate human-to-human transmission in experiments may never be fully understood. The Spanish flu virus vanished, only to be resurrected in 2005 for research aimed at understanding its virulence.

The CDC has noted that the 1918 virus was uniquely deadly and not like any other human influenza viruses tested. As ethical considerations now prevent human infection experiments, scientists may never uncover why the Spanish flu did not transmit as expected in controlled settings. Nonetheless, these studies indicated that human contact alone does not account for the pandemic's spread; other underlying factors likely contributed.

Evidence suggests that co-infection with tuberculosis may have been a significant factor in severe influenza cases during the 1918 outbreak. Alternatively, animal interactions might have played a crucial role in the transmission of the virus.

How Tuberculosis Fueled the 1918 Flu and Covid-19 Pandemics

A consensus review by global experts acknowledges the significant role of TB in viral respiratory infections.

This article draws inspiration from Mad Mockingbird.

Share the page:

Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkIn

-----------------------

Recent Post:

Understanding Covid-19: Insights After Two Years of Research

A comprehensive look at Covid-19, its mechanisms, symptoms, and implications for public health after two years of research.

Exploring the Future of Artificial Wombs: A New Frontier

Investigating the potential of artificial wombs for pre-term infants and the FDA's role in their development.

Creating a Six-Figure One-Person Business Through Content in 2023

Explore how content creation can elevate your one-person business to six figures in 2023 and beyond.