Is Physics in a Post-Factual Era? Examining String Theory's Validity
Written on
The Foundations of Empirical Science
The phrase "science is empirical" may seem quite obvious to most scientists. Essentially, being 'empirical' means engaging with facts, data, and observable phenomena, whether through human perception or scientific instruments. Traditional scientific methods—such as chemical reactions, physical experiments, and observational studies—are fundamentally empirical in nature.
Historically, however, the role of experimentation in science was not universally accepted. In the 17th century, thinkers like Thomas Hobbes criticized experimental methods, arguing they were too controlled and artificial to reveal genuine truths about the natural world. Instead, they advocated for observational science, relying on reason to explain naturally occurring phenomena.
Since the 1660s, experimentation has become increasingly central to scientific inquiry, marking what is often referred to as the "Scientific Revolution." Today, experiments are a staple in science education, distinguishing scientific disciplines from the humanities and arts.
The Shift in Modern Physics
As we delve into modern physics, we find that it has diverged from this long-standing experimental tradition. Theoretical frameworks such as string theory have gained immense popularity within the physics community, evidenced by the volume of citations in theoretical research. However, string theory remains devoid of any experimental validation.
String theorists have not conducted experiments, nor have they proposed any practical tests that could affirm their theories. In contrast, quantum mechanics—a much older discipline—has led to tangible technological advances, including the development of quantum computers.
Some may argue that string theory is simply too innovative to yield immediate experimental results. However, considering that string theory emerged in the late 1960s, it has been over 50 years without significant empirical outcomes. By the time quantum mechanics reached its 50th anniversary, thousands of experiments had already confirmed its predictions.
Arguments in Favor of String Theory
Despite its lack of experimental grounding, string theory does have certain theoretical advantages. Richard Dawid, a physicist-turned-philosopher, suggests that the absence of viable alternatives might warrant a "wait and see" approach. His Bayesian perspective posits that the lack of competing theories could enhance string theory's credibility. While this logic may be debatable, there are compelling reasons to support string theorists in their pursuit of truth.
One notable feature of string theory is its remarkable internal coherence. While coherence alone does not guarantee truth, it is a necessary condition for any valid theory. Furthermore, string theory is unique in that it contains no "free parameters," which are constants introduced into equations to align theoretical predictions with empirical data. The absence of these parameters indicates a level of completeness and elegance not found in other physical theories.
Critiques of the Post-Empirical Approach
However, the main critique against string theory remains its lack of empirical verification. Critics like Sabine Hossenfelder and Peter Woit argue that this absence raises significant questions about its scientific status. Woit notably challenges Dawid's claims regarding string theory's free parameters, asserting that without a comprehensive understanding of the theory, such assertions are unfounded.
Hossenfelder firmly advocates for a pragmatic view of science, emphasizing its role in producing useful theories rather than simply pursuing aesthetic elegance. She argues that if string theory fails to describe nature or lacks any empirical aspiration, it cannot be deemed physics. For her, the essence of science lies in its practical applicability.
The Ongoing Debate: Post-Fact or Pre-Fact?
Despite the ongoing critiques, research in string theory continues unabated. While Dawid's faith in string theory as the ultimate scientific framework may seem overly optimistic, it remains to be seen whether this theory can yield meaningful predictions or applications. Some theorists suggest that empirical evidence for string theory could arise from the discovery of supersymmetric particles, although current particle colliders may not yet be capable of probing the necessary energies.
This leads us to ponder whether string theory is truly post-fact, indicating a shift away from empirical validation, or pre-fact, suggesting that we have yet to gather the necessary data to substantiate or challenge its claims. Regardless of its classification, string theory's current momentum suggests that it will continue to attract significant research interest for the foreseeable future.
As we navigate the complexities of modern physics, the future of string theory remains uncertain, yet its pursuit is relentless.
In this insightful video, the discussion revolves around the implications of misinformation in today's post-truth society.
In this interview, James Weatherall explores the challenges faced by science in a world influenced by post-truth narratives.