# The Complex Reality of AI-Generated Content and Its Implications
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding AI-Generated Content
The distinction between AI-generated images and text may seem trivial at first glance. However, a deeper examination reveals significant nuances.
Many authors express their dissatisfaction with tools like ChatGPT, arguing that its writing lacks depth and personality. Ironically, these same individuals often utilize Midjourney to create visuals for their narratives. It appears that their frequent use of free stock images from platforms such as Pexels and Unsplash has dulled their awareness of the similarities between Midjourney's image generation and ChatGPT's text creation. Both AI systems rely on human-generated data that they did not compensate for, leading to rapid, cost-free outputs.
These AI technologies epitomize the trifecta of successful business: efficiency, affordability, and quality.
Conversely, some artists and designers avoid Midjourney due to its perceived lack of creativity, yet they turn to ChatGPT for textual content to accompany their artwork. They share the same ethical concerns regarding AI as writers do about image generation, which is to say, none at all.
A potential remedy might be to prohibit all forms of AI-generated content on social media and in commercial applications. However, two key factors make this unlikely: technical challenges and financial motivations.
Section 1.1: Technical Challenges in Identifying AI Content
Identifying AI-generated content can be quite complex. A novice using straightforward prompts may produce easily recognizable outputs, but a skilled user who expertly crafts prompts and refines the results can generate narratives that are indistinguishable from those created by human authors.
Employing professionals to discern AI-generated content is not a viable solution, as the associated costs could be prohibitive, with no guarantee of success. Businesses prioritize profitability, which is evident in platforms like Medium, which has adjusted its AI policies. Currently, they allow AI-generated content but restrict its distribution beyond the author’s personal network.
For the time being, Medium relies on human writers and their expertise. However, if AI-generated content becomes sufficiently sophisticated, or if individuals become adept at leveraging AI tools, I suspect that Medium will accept and distribute such content, attracting subscribers who find it engaging.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Illusion of Disclosure
Asking for transparency regarding AI use in content creation is somewhat illusory. There will always be individuals who disregard such guidelines, especially if their work is compelling. Ultimately, the quality of the content is what matters most in retaining audience interest and subscriptions.
Where do we draw the line? Several prominent Medium writers have advocated for the use of ChatGPT to enhance research, generate better titles, and refine drafts. Should these authors be obligated to disclose their use of such tools?
Section 1.2: Ethical Considerations in Media
Previously mentioned, Medium serves merely as an example. Why would major newspapers or magazines forgo AI-generated articles in favor of human journalists when doing so could substantially boost profits? The only conceivable rationale is a moral one.
However, observing the current media landscape, it seems that ethical considerations do not weigh heavily on the minds of media executives.
Chapter 2: The Broader Impact of AI in Media
The first video, "Can We Trust What We See? (The Curse of AI Generated Content)," delves into the challenges of discerning truth in an age dominated by AI-produced content.
The second video, "Finding Truth in AI Generated Content | Episode 17 | AI or Die," explores strategies for navigating the complexities of AI-generated narratives and their implications for authenticity.
In conclusion, as AI continues to evolve, the intersection of morality, profitability, and the nature of content creation will likely shape the future of media and storytelling.